Тренувальний Міні-контест на УКХРегламент контестаСтатистика контеста
0 Користувачів і 1 Гість дивляться цю тему.
UY6IM после продажи кенвуда 2000 хотел взять 590-й, но взял 950-й. очень доволен. подозреваю что ему дизайн больше понравился.
встроенный жпс с возможностью показывать на экране сразу локатор - я бы взял!
Цитата: "US7IGN" post=13740 встроенный жпс с возможностью показывать на экране сразу локатор - я бы взял!чей локатор и зачем???
http://uu2jj.ltd.ua/ts-590s.htmпо части DSP взул многих я думаю KENWOOD TS-590S: Texas Instruments – TMS320C6726B 2800 MIPS (million instructions per second) Cycle Time <3,75 ns 266 MHz Clock Rateshttp://uu2jj.ltd.ua/ft-950.htm
Эхх, проворонил я скидки на 590 :silly: Кто-нибудь встречал внятное описание, каке доделки кенвуд делал в этом трансе? И с каких серийников они введены?
I have had both. I had the FT950 for 7 months and the TS590 now for 3. In short the downsides of the FT950 compared to the TS590 are: Lots of things that you need to use on the FT950 are in menus which doesn't help when its a radio that needs a lot of tweaking to get the best out of it. For example to change the power involves pressing the menu button, rotating to menu 118, changing the power, pressing the menu button in for 2 seconds to remember it. Also only one programmable function button. Close in signal handling is nowhere near as good as the Kenwood and when you narrow down the DSP to 1kHz, the audio is hard to understand on phone whereas I can understand audio on the Kenwood with as little as 600Hz bandwidth. No USB and need to buy CAT cable and audio cables for digital mode. No ability to alter RX audio other than altering USB carrier and Contour setting. The TX panoramic equaliser needs a LOT of tweaking. Audio doesn't sound as clear. Auto notch not as good and also no manual notch - you have to try and use Contour to mimic manual notch Nothing equivalent to the BC button Noise blanking is effectively useless. Built in ATU - well there's a story on its own. Only matches 3:1, rattles like the relays are falling to bits and takes 5-10 seconds to find a match whereas the TS590 is silent, matches 10:1 and takes next to no time to do it. No CW Tune to put out a low power carrier to wake up a remote tuner or allow you to tune a manual tuner. Instead you need to press CW then menu button, then go to menu 118, then set to a low power, then key up with one hand and tune with the other hand then set menu 118 back to where you want it then hold menu button in for 2 seconds. On the TS590 you merely assign a PF key the CW Tune option and press the PF key when you want to tune. Feels cheap. The extendable legs feel really cheap and wobbly. Cannot read the display with a light source shining onto it - its both reflective and not bright enough. The display is recessed so if you look down on it at say a 45 degree angle, you can't see the top third of the display as its obscured by the front panel No receive antenna socket No 136kHz output It does have some pros... It comes with a high stability TXCO as standard Infinitely adjustable resistance on the main tuning knob. IF out via additional daughterboard Audio cable is a standard mini DIN and not a proprietary connector Er....err.....its big and fills a desk. Don't get me wrong, the FT950 was a good radio when it came out and it still is a good radio. It had triple band stacking, IF DSP, three built in roofing filters, a built in high stability TXCO, better 2kHz dynamic range than the FT2000 and none of the FT2000's RX problems and there wasn't anything to touch it at the price it was, being basically a single tuner FT2000 with all the filters you'd normall pay for but with none of the FT2000's problems. The FT950s shortcomings are down to two things. The first is building to a lower price which hit the quality of the materials use but also led to the main problem - Yaesus obsession with having single function buttons and putting lots of things you need to use in menus. The same arguments hold true for Yaesu and Kenwoods other directly competing radios - the FT857/897 and the TS480 - crap usability and too much menu diving on the FT857/897 with a very hard to read display coupled with poor build quality - you don't hear of the TS480 getting a loose selector knob for example whereas all FT857's will due to Yaesu skimping and using a plastic rod on the selector switch instead of a metal one. Unfortunately for the FT950, a couple of years later Kenwood released the TS590 and brought out a better radio which addressed all the Yaesus usability issues that I highlighted above in the same price bracket as the FT950 but with a better quality feel.
Автор
Тема: Kenwood TS-590 vs Yaesu FT-950 (Прочитано 8551 раз)
